Oh, and some folks have to have a red ring! I picked up a 17-40 since I don't need f2.8 for a UWA, if I did I'd be looking at the Tokina 16-28 f2.8 instead. The only reason I could think of for a 16-35 would be if you need a fast lens on a full frame, period. ![]() They have upped their game and their recent lenses are really shaking things up. I'm a lover of Sigma lenses - in fact I was just posting a slight disappointment that my new 24-105 isn't nearly as sharp as my Sigma lenses. Designed exclusively for cameras with APS-C sized sensors, it covers the 35mm equivalent of 29-56mm on Canon DSLRs and 27-52mm on other bodies. Optically it's a little better than the 17-40, and one stop faster. With the fixed aperture of f/1.8, the lens is sensitive to light. The 16-35 is well built, but hardly amazing. The Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art for Canon is a lens with a wide-angle to normal range. I have no doubt it's sharper and obviously it's faster. If I was still on crop - this would certainly be one I'd pick up - over and above the 16-35. The lens is really on the new side so it's a little soon for folks to give feedback. I think somebody here posted some thoughts on the Sigma. ![]() I'm aware these lenses don't have IS but when this wide I've not found it a problem yet, what little shake I may get shooting handheld I can fix quite easily in AE and to get the same build quality as a Canon L lens I generally have to go for an f4 lens (with IS) which isn't great for my photography work.Īny thoughts on this would be greatly appreciated This could save me a fair few hundred (GBP). My other option is to get a Canon 16-35 mark 1 (instead of the mark 2) which I know has issues around the edge but I hear it doesn't make much difference on a crop sensor. I can't find many people talking about the build quality of the Sigma 18-35, is it any good? I've had to shoot in all sorts of environments before so I don't want to limit myself with a lesser quality build. I know a few people will suggest the Canon 17-55 for a crop sensor camera like the 7D but build quality is important to me. Has anyone used the Sigma 18-35 1.8, how does it compare? You can purchase the Sigma 18-35 for 799 here: B&H Photo Adorama Amazon Verdict Okay, let’s just get the obvious stuff out of the way: Construction Superb. ![]() However today I saw Blunt圓000's review of the Sigma 18-35 1.8 Recently I've been shooting various events and property videos and have been hiring the Canon 16-35 2.8 to do so but I'm now at a stage where I can buy another lens and obviously my first thought was to buy that one. I'm working with a Canon 7D camera at the moment, for a mix of photojournalism and corporate videos. Product details F1.8 maximum aperture F16 minimum Ring-type ultrasonic-type AF motor with full-time manual focusing, 72 mm filter size Minimum focusing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |